Menu
  • Home
  • Feature
    • Breaking News
    • Arts
    • Astrology
    • Business
    • Community
    • Employment
    • Event Stories
    • From the Pioneer
    • Government
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Non Profit News
    • Obituary
    • Public Safety
    • Podcast Interview Articles
    • Pioneer Pulse Podcast: Politics, Palette, and Planet – the Playlist
  • Guest Column
    • Perspectives
    • Don Backman Photos
    • Ardent Gourmet
    • Kitchen Maven
    • I’ve been thinking
    • Jim Heffernan
    • The Littoral Life
    • Neal Lemery
    • View From Here
    • Virginia Carrell Prowell
    • Words of Wisdom
  • Weather
  • Post Submission
  • Things to do
    • Calendar
    • Tillamook County Parks
    • Tillamook County Hikes
    • Whale Watching
    • Tillamook County Library
    • SOS Community Calendar
  • About
    • Contribute
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Opt-out preferences
  • Search...
Menu

Letter to Editor: Oregon Safe Waters Act HB 2656

Posted on March 19, 2019March 19, 2019 by Editor

Although I am aware of Tillamook County’s marriage to timber companies for most of its history, I believe we have come to a time when timber and water quality must come to terms. Currently the state legislature is debating HB 2656, the Oregon Safe Waters Act.
As described in the Statesman Journal: “Oregon lawmakers want to protect public drinking water sources by banning ‘type 3’ clear-cuts, pesticide and fertilizer applications, and new logging roads on private forestland in those watersheds.”
“The bill uses the federal definition of drinking water source boundaries, which together cover much of western Oregon.”
“The aim is to prevent disasters such as last year’s Detroit Lake algae bloom, which shut down drinking water supplies in the state Capital for more than a month.”

The Forest Practices that private timber companies operate under in Oregon are weaker in their restrictions concerning water quality than the regulations in Washington, California and Idaho.
The weaker regulations can end up posing risks to community’s water supplies, risks to fish runs in our rivers, and increase risks of landslides, wildfires and flooding.
“We do not have the same standards for forest practices our neighbors to the north and south have,” said Rep. Andrea Salinas, D-Lake Oswego, who is co-sponsoring the bill with Rep. Karin Power, D-Milwaukie. “Some of (Oregon’s) big timber companies also do harvesting in those states.” If the timber companies are already complying in those three states, they can certainly do so in Oregon.
Sarah Deumling, of Polk County’s Zena Forest Products, said her family has been practicing commercial forestry that would meet the requirements of the bill since 1987. “Such a change in forest management would make Oregon truly a model of sustainable forestry and a wise state government would do all they can to help folks make the change,” Deumling said.
And some of the state’s largest private timber owners, including Weyerhaeuser, Hampton Lumber, Stimson Lumber and Starker Forests, are fighting the proposal. They say private forest owners already are good stewards of their land. Status quo is not really going to cut it if we consider the algae blooms, increased fire dangers with basically each year getting warmer and warmer, and drought becoming commonplace in Oregon. Our commitment needs to be to respond responsibly to the changes we are experiencing, not continue like nothing is changing here.
“This bill would have devastating financial consequences for private forestland owners large and small and certainly for us here at Starker Forests,” said Gary Springer, a forester for the Benton County company. Maybe those costs of change reflect the true cost of doing business in our current, more challenging environment.
Violation of the new restrictions would be a Class A misdemeanor, carrying a fine of up to $6,250, 364 days imprisonment, or both.
Furthermore, this bill would help clean up our drinking water without shrinking our forest work force while the Oregon Forest Carbon Incentives Act would actually create MORE jobs in rural areas by shifting the $300 million per year in subsidies Oregon taxpayers are doling out to Big Timber toward more sustainable forest management practices. It takes more timber workers on the land, not less, to harvest timber sustainably.
More than 50 people signed up to testify during a public hearing on the bill Tuesday afternoon. Many did not get a chance to speak. As a result, the committee will continue to accept written testimony through March 21. Please write to your Representative* in support of HB 2656.

Randall Koch, Neskowin

*Oregon House Representatives for the area are – or go to https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/FindYourLegislator/leg-districts.html
District 32 (Clatsop & North/Central Tillamook Counties) – Representative Tiffiny Mitchell
Phone: 503-986-1432
Address: 900 Court St NE, H-285, Salem, OR, 97301
Rep.TiffinyMitchell@oregonlegislature.gov
http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/mitchell

District 10 (South Tillamook & Lincoln Counties)
Representative David Gomberg
Phone: 503-986-1410
Address: 900 Court St NE, H-471, Salem, OR, 97301
Rep.DavidGomberg@oregonlegislature.gov
https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/gomberg

Featured Video

Ads

Slide Contribute SUBSCRIBE

Tillamook Weather

Tides

Tillamook County Pioneer Podcast Series

Tillamook Church Search

Cloverdale Baptist Church
Nestucca Valley Presbyterian
Tillamook Ecumenical Service

Archives

  • Home
  • EULA Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Opt-out preferences
  • Search...
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin
Catherine

Recent Posts

  • Noland Arbaugh’s Neuralink Journey Unveiled

    June 21, 2025
  • WORDS OF WISDOM: Thinking About Fathers’ Day

    June 21, 2025
  • Nestucca High School heroes showed courage, compassion, and wisdom when it mattered most; Their quick action save Coach's life

    June 21, 2025
©2025 | Theme by SuperbThemes

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}