Menu
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Feature
    • Arts
    • Astrology
    • Business
    • Community
    • Employment
    • Event Stories
    • From the Pioneer
    • Government
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Non Profit News
    • Obituary
    • Public Safety
    • Podcast Interview Articles
    • Pioneer Pulse Podcast: Politics, Palette, and Planet – the Playlist
  • Weather
  • Guest Column
    • Perspectives
    • Don Backman Photos
    • Ardent Gourmet
    • Kitchen Maven
    • I’ve been thinking
    • Jim Heffernan
    • The Littoral Life
    • Neal Lemery
    • View From Here
    • Virginia Carrell Prowell
    • Words of Wisdom
  • Things to do
    • Calendar
    • Tillamook County Parks
    • Tillamook County Hikes
    • Whale Watching
    • Tillamook County Library
    • SOS Community Calendar
  • About
    • Contribute
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Opt-out preferences
  • Post Submission Test
  • Search...
Menu

RESPONSE: FACTS about Transparency and Compensation

Posted on May 16, 2023 by Editor
www.tillamookcountypioneer.net

by Deb Simmons, Mayor of Manzanita
Recently, there was an article by Kim Rosenberg about Transparency and Compensation*. It referenced the evaluation process of the City Manager which, in Manzanita, has traditionally been headed by Council President, Linda Kozlowski.
Although writiing about discussions in an executive session violates city rules which is clearly defined to “journalists” at the start of each meeting, the recent evaluation of the City Manager was made public. In that light, the process should also be public.
As a councilor, I was told to simply fill out the 2-page forms and turn them in. I did so with a note of concern about the brevity of the forms. Although I asked, I was not informed of all the pieces that were included. Those didn’t come to light until the executive session when the evaluation was reviewed. However, prior to the meeting, I researched the process in other cities.

In Toledo, Oregon, evaluations of the city manager are done by an “evaluation team” made up of the Mayor and the Council President. Mayor Rod Cross of Toledo said, “bluntly put, two sets of eyes are required.” This “team” approach was the norm with other mayors. Independent services can also be employed.
League of Oregon Cities (LOC) best practices also recommends that the position of Council President rotate every year and suggests that a councilor stepping in must have 2 years of experience before becoming Council President. This would also impact the evaluation process.
According to Governmentresource.com. under Evaluation “Pitfalls to avoid,” (#2, page 24), “when relationships are too close, supportive and friendly, there can be a reluctance to bring up areas of performance that need improvement and a tendency to avoid conflict.” This was sent out by City/County Insurance Service (CIS) to mayors with advice to update the evaluation processes.
From my research, I learned that evaluations should include:
A) written reviews from department heads — templates are available
B) the prior evaluation – which should include measurable goals against which growth can be measured and needed support identified
C) a self-evaluation form which includes narrative and numerical scores – templates are available
D) assessment of alignment with city-wide core values
E) both narrative and numerical scores from individual councilors

The recommended form from CIS has 31 questions on 7 pages. In Manzanita, councilors were given 12 questions on 2 pages (unclear who compiled these questions) handed out by Councilor Kozlowski. One page had 7 categories requiring numerical scoring between 1-5. The second page was five “open ended questions.”
It is standard practice for the “evaluation team” to average the numerical scores together and compile the “open-ended” answers. In Manzanita, however, 4 councilor scores were averaged together and 1 councilor’s scores were set off under the title of “Opposing view:” The same thing happened with the open-ended answers.
Councilor Kozlowski said recently that she reviewed Manzanita’s evaluation process with the CIS, and she indicated they gave a nod of approval. Yet, when I shared the evaluation write-up compiled by Councilor Kozlowski with Mayor Cross from Toledo, he was “alarmed.” Another mayor was similarily disturbed.
As the administrative head of Manzanita’s government, the evaluation process must be revised and updated to project the full scope of assessment, potential growth and support needed for our city manager. It must follow fair and equitable rules maintaining a high professional standard from the council and be closely aligned with the code of ethics of the ICMA, The international City/Council Management Association.
Finally, Tamera Russell, Deputy General Counsel with CIS, said generally speaking, employee evaluations have no place in public discussions.
Next April, the council needs to improve and revise the evaluation process for the city manager. Doing it the way it has been done in the past, should not be the way of our future.

* https://www.tillamookcountypioneer.net/manzanita-musings-transparency-and-compensation/

Featured Video

Slide Contribute SUBSCRIBE

Tillamook Weather

Tides

Tillamook County Pioneer Podcast Series

Tillamook Church Search

Cloverdale Baptist Church
Nestucca Valley Presbyterian
Tillamook Ecumenical Service

Archives

  • Home
  • EULA Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Opt-out preferences
  • Search...
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin
Catherine

Recent Posts

  • Where Art Lives: A Reflection from the Oregon Coast  

    May 9, 2025
  • MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH: Reducing the Longevity Liability - Understanding Suicide Risk in Older Adults

    May 9, 2025
  • OBITUARY: Sara "Gail" Hudspeth - May 6, 1940 - May 5, 2025

    May 9, 2025
©2025 | Theme by SuperbThemes

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}