Menu
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Feature
    • Arts
    • Astrology
    • Business
    • Community
    • Employment
    • Event Stories
    • From the Pioneer
    • Government
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Non Profit News
    • Obituary
    • Public Safety
    • Podcast Interview Articles
    • Pioneer Pulse Podcast: Politics, Palette, and Planet – the Playlist
  • Weather
  • Guest Column
    • Perspectives
    • Don Backman Photos
    • Ardent Gourmet
    • Kitchen Maven
    • I’ve been thinking
    • Jim Heffernan
    • The Littoral Life
    • Neal Lemery
    • View From Here
    • Virginia Carrell Prowell
    • Words of Wisdom
  • Things to do
    • Calendar
    • Tillamook County Parks
    • Tillamook County Hikes
    • Whale Watching
    • Tillamook County Library
    • SOS Community Calendar
  • About
    • Contribute
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Opt-out preferences
  • Post Submission Test
  • Search...
Menu

Re: NCRD. A Response for Kimber

Posted on May 17, 2021May 17, 2021 by Editor

To Kimber: It always comes down to the restrooms – a universal need.

Let’s talk about ‘ADA Restrooms’. Please stop calling them ‘ADA’ restrooms. By now, we must all be familiar that any new public construction must be ADA compliant and for that there is a very good reason we will discuss another day. For this reason, we would not identify a restroom by ethnicity, race, or religion, why would we call out the disability community? They are restrooms! Perhaps this is a strategy to deflect our attention from the original desire of a new theater lobby. What is primarily important is that these new restrooms are universally designed so any person can access them with full respect vs. ‘men’ or ‘women’ restrooms. Again, this is a conversation we can have later.

I too was at the November and December 2020 NCRD Board meetings. While “the [NCRD theater lobby] plans were drawn by a professional experienced architect with the express purpose of meeting all ADA requirements, and that the plans were approved by the county, and that they met precise state and federal ADA specification”, what I heard, at the meeting, was one of our brave theater patrons ask that before we start construction we consider if the new restrooms are usable by those claimed they are for. What Kimber and I are asking is, if access to them is prohibitive then what good are they? The best way to know would have been to listen to someone with the true lived experience of relying on a wheelchair for mobility, BEFORE construction began. If we are unwilling to do this, are we truly serving our entire community? These are not a “select few seeking special privileges”. These are your neighbors trying to attain the same good experience that others are afforded. I have been told by my friends who use wheelchairs, not being able to access a restroom without someone’s help is not independence, nor is it dignified. I believe them.

For the time being, what’s done is done, the construction moved forward. Now we live with what we have, but it doesn’t change the fact that we must learn to listen in order to hear. For now, our patrons who use a chair will hopefully find a friend to help them to the bathroom.

At that board meeting, Constance really listened, heard, changed her mind, and acted upon it for a better solution toward true inclusion, and it speaks volumes. She is on the right side of inclusion in its most authentic form. Instead of belittling someone who sees it different she saw it through their eyes and has acted with grace and class ever since. It seems like this boogey-monster ‘change’ has some scared; of what? If folks are having a hard time working with ‘different’ please ask yourselves why. If we truly want to practice inclusion, why wouldn’t we invite those in who are different than us to learn from them? If we are being inclusive, we will seek out what modifications or accommodations are needed so each of us can participate. This is not scary; in this case it is the very simple intentional act of assuring each person the same self-respect to use a restroom in our community building.

As the crisis of the pandemic lulls on, we are only beginning to see exposure of foundational weaknesses emerge. I am hopeful we can come together to offer our unique strengths and gifts to create stronger and better selves, systems, and communities. This conversation will continue. I thank Constance for raising the level of awareness on the serious issue of the need to advocate for inclusion with her candidacy. I trust that she will continue the work no matter the outcome of this election. I have given her my vote. Today, I ask my friends and my community… those of you that know me, my family, my ongoing efforts to make inclusion a natural course rather than a struggle…I ask each of you to do the same. If you cast only one vote for one race in this election let it be for Constance Shimek for the NCRD Board.

Julie Chick
Nehalem

Please see what Oregon Parks and Recreation (OPRD) is doing after they looked at all of their Oregon parks for access deficiencies: https://www.tillamookcountypioneer.net/new-ada-transition-plan-will-guide-oregon-state-parks-improvement-projects/

Featured Video

Slide Contribute SUBSCRIBE

Tillamook Weather

Tides

Tillamook County Pioneer Podcast Series

Tillamook Church Search

Cloverdale Baptist Church
Nestucca Valley Presbyterian
Tillamook Ecumenical Service

Archives

  • Home
  • EULA Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Opt-out preferences
  • Search...
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin
Catherine

Recent Posts

  • BREAKING NEWS: Successful Rescue Mission at Sheriff’s Office Today, May 23rd

    May 23, 2025
  • CIVIC SATURDAYS WITH JIM HEFFERNAN – Sermon #14 – Become America; Transcript from “Which Dream Do You Dream”

    May 23, 2025
  • A shout out for Community Building in North Tillamook County last weekend May 16-18

    May 23, 2025
©2025 | Theme by SuperbThemes

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}